What do we know about emergency room triage?

When the emergency room gets a huge influx of cases in a disaster it's time for triage, the separation of the those most likely to need and benefit from immediate emergency care from those that can wait or can't be helped. In a mass casualty disaster the assumption is that triage should start outside the doors of the ER, sending only the sickest there. Makes sense. But is it true? A computer simulation done by Cornell Medical School suggests it might not be:

. . . researchers at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center have created a computer simulation model of trauma system response to mass casualty incidents involving dozens or hundreds of injured victims. The study shows that the best response depends more on the capability of regional hospitals to treat critically injured victims than on the ability to accurately identify those victims in the field.

"There's been the notion gleaned from prior studies that 'overtriage'--letting some people into emergency care who might not actually need it--usually ends up costing lives, with deaths rising as overtriage rates increase. But our new model demonstrates that overtriage alone is unlikely to be the culprit," says lead researcher Dr. Nathaniel Hupert, assistant professor of public health and medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College and assistant attending physician at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center. (Sciencedaily)

The problem is that the out-of-ER triage system has to be right. Making split second decisions is not a recipe for accuracy. Once this is taken into account, other factors, such as overall capacity and processing time are more important. If you let more in than you should, you also decrease the errors of keeping some out that you should have seen. But it depends on how much capacity you have:

"In some cases--for example, when the risk of death over the short term is high but you have a really large capacity to care for the injured--we can now show how overtriage may actually be a good thing, because you get more people into emergency care than you would otherwise," Dr. Hupert says. "On the other hand, if you have a more limited capacity, overtriage can be much less valuable, and perhaps harmful."

So if you have limited reserve capacity you probably need to triage outside the ER. "Overtriage" won't matter if you can't handle what's coming in. But if you can, then overtriage might hurt. It will depend on local conditions. Right now, though, these conditions aren't taken into account. Plans are based on limiting overtriage.

The simulation was designed for a mass casualty trauma event. It would seem, though, that the same lessons would apply to a pandemic or disease outbreak. Intake rate would be less and processing time could be speeded up, once knowing this is a critical variable. We need more efforts like this specifically aimed at pandemic scenarios.

More like this

The New Yorker's News Desk blog features an excellent piece by Atul Gawande called "Why Boston's Hospitals Were Ready." It's a riveting read about how emergency medical teams, the city's emergency command center, and hospital staff all responded immediately and with admirable coordination to the…
I've written a lot about a doctor named Stanislaw Burzynski who claims to have much better outcomes in treating deadly brainstem tumors than conventional oncology does. Although the way he claims to do it is through the use of substances he calls "antineoplastons," which he claimed to have isolate…
Trials are staring on a new cancer vaccine. The melanoma trial is being conducted at New York University Medical Center, while the ovarian cancer vaccine trial is at the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, N.Y. The trials are assessing the safety and the anti-tumor immune response of the so…
David Colquhoun, eminent scientist and maintainer of the excellent blog DC's Improbable Science, has recently returned home to the U.K. after a trip across the pond to the U.S. and Canada, where, among other things, he gave a lecture at the University of Toronto, as well as the Riker Memorial…

Very soon, perhaps within 6 months, it is possible Bush will authorize the use of 30,000 pound blockbuster bombs to knock out the underground nuclear reactors in Iran. He will also send in bombers with tactical atomic bombs with the explosive power of the bomb dropped on Nagasaki.
What kind of filth has the United States become, to have killed over 1 million Iraq civilians in Iraq; how now its leaders have the audacity to contemplate mass homicide of millions or innocent people in Iran? I am an American citizen, but I now longer live in the United States.
How much blood is oil for the United States worth? What kind of emergency hospital system will they have to take care of all those dying of radiation poisoning in Iran?
Even the death of one innocent Iraq or Iran civilian is not worth the obscene oil for America.