Sport Science FTW!

Normally, it isn't really news when a show doesn't do anything wrong. I am making an exception for ESPN's Sport Science. Here is part 2 of Sport Science trying to reproduce Kobe Bryant's "jumping over a car" stunt.

And here is part 1 (although part 2 is the only interesting part). See. I can get along with Sport Science. Anyway, I am not sure that Kobe's jump used wires - but I assumed it was fake. Here is my analysis of Kobe's Jump (this stuff is old). And this is the plot I created from video analysis of Kobe.

i-bb141db6b940f2fe2cd837bc95762584-2010-04-28_kobe_bryant_jumping_over_a_car_dot_physics.jpg

The tough thing about looking at Kobe's jump is that he changes his body position. I had to look at several parts of his body during the jump and kind of estimate the motion of his center of mass.

Sport Science: I hope we can be friends now. I like friends that have cool toys.

More like this

The playground outside SteedlyKid's day care, amazingly in this litigious age, has a merry-go-round, a rotating disc with a really good bearing. The kids can really get the thing flying, which is kind of terrifying at times. But on the bright side, it's an excellent venue for the physics of angular…
A couple of weeks ago, I revisited George Shollenberger, the creator the alleged "First Scientific Proof of God", and commented on his pathetic antics on amazon.com, trying to explain just why no one had bothered to post a single review of his book. (If you'll recall, according to George, it's…
Over the weekend, before the whole Scientific America debacle blew up, Ben Lillie tweeted: Looking for science news pegs that aren't "a paper was published." Good examples? #ScioOcean #scionew — Ben Lillie (@BenLillie) October 12, 2013 This is, of course, a familiar problem to a lot of people…
Also known as the worst movie ever made. What I'm going to discuss doesn't come even close to "the worst blog post ever made", but, well, you'll see. So: the backstory. I've been commenting on some of JoNova's stuff. Its not the big time, but unlike WUWT, or BishopHill, or a variety of minor blogs…

Your link to the old analysis has an extra 'A' on the end.

It seemed like the unaided stuntman could get the peak height, but not get the duration above the hood/trunk for all his body parts.

Could you plot a shape on the graph with the profile of the car's duration at the different heights? Height-of-car vs t?

@Dave,

Thanks for pointing out the link error. And yes - that is an excellent idea for a graph. I will do that (soon).

@Rob,

Yes! I remember that show and I think I remember the guy jumping over a car.

also, I edited your post so your link would always work.