My blog is worth $165,410.22.
How much is your blog worth?
According to this guy, however, it's only worth $18,337. Either way, I'll gladly take a check. If I took it in cash, the government might seize it without bothering to charge me with anything.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
...you're poor. Previously, I discussed the effects of the de facto privatization of money:
But most of the discussion is over how large the fees should be. That's important, but ignores the larger issue: the de facto privatization of our monetary system. While it doesn't seem obvious, when you…
I'm baaack.
Well, thanks to free WiFi at Panera's, I was never really truly away. Thanks to Comcast, I was away longer than usual. In any case, although between waiting for Internet access, running errands, and doing some snowblowing last night, I didn't have time to do the usual epic…
As ScienceBlogs' resident firearms enthusiast (I might own more guns than the rest of the SB writers combined - and I don't own very many), I've occasionally written about gun rights and related issues. One of the things I've noticed is that a lot of people aren't very familiar with what gun laws…
...the long-awaited migration to WordPress, promised ever since NatGeo took over:
Notice: ScienceBlogs.com will be migrating to a new publishing platform starting on the evening of Monday, May 21 at 7 PM Eastern Standard Time. Please do not add any comments or posts between then and Tuesday…
Science Blogs homepage gives a "worth" of absolutely nothing. As I doubt any blog has a negative "worth", I think I would take it with a grain of salt. In case they ignore non-blogs: The TalkOrigins Archive is "worth" $439,776.66
The Panda's Thumb is "worth" $542,522.94
That's because the front page gets no incoming links, all the content is on the individual blogs.
Either way, mine is worth nothing. As I thought...
$165,410.22 is bush league. The same calculator yields a value of $1,060,206.12 for STACLU. This irreparably warps the meaning of the old saying, "I feel like a million bucks!"
STACLU pumps up their link stats artificially with open trackback posts. That's why there's such an enormous disparity between the number of incoming links they get and the number of actual readers they get (a sizable portion of which they probably get from here since I critique them so often).