At the request of Antigua, where many online gaming sites are located, the World Trade Organization has set up a committee to investigate our government's activities in regard to online gambling. Antigua and many other nations say that trying to shut down this trade that is perfectly legal almost everywhere but here is a restraint of trade that violates the WTO agreements. This could get interesting.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I've written before about Washington's new law against internet gambling, one of the most obnoxious and hypocritical pieces of legislation imaginable. Remember how they assured everyone that they didn't intend to go after the players with this law? Apparently that's because they were planning to go…
I've been doing a bit of research, spurred by this article by Allyn Jaffrey Shulman, on the legal status of online poker. And I've found that most of what Shulman says is spot on. She points to a Federal court ruling in the case of In re Mastercard International, the full text of which can be found…
Things have been crazy the last couple days in the online gaming world. The response from various companies ranges from "maybe we can survive this" to "man the lifeboats". Party Poker has announced that if the president signs the bill (which is inevitable, and will likely happen in the next day or…
I've been gathering information on the new internet gambling bill. No one can know for sure just how draconian it will be until the Treasury department writes the regulations to implement it, but here's what I am tentatively concluding at this point: the bill will fail to achieve its purpose. It…
I would have thought that legalisation would be a nightmare for Antigua. All those gambling server farms would relocate to Delaware.
I don't know how the WTO functions, but from other international bodies it's usually that they can make whatever judgements they want but powerful nations can just ignore them.
Matthew said:
Indeed. The US certainly doesn't have a problem ignoring them, say, when it comes to things like softwood lumber. (Gee, can you tell I've been an expat living in Canada for five years?)
I remember reading the decision of the first panel to hear the antigua-US dispute, and thinking that the reasoning was a little thin. Defensible, but just barely. Given that, and given the casino-Abramoff money in play, this'll almost certainly be another intractable softwood lumber kind of situation.