STACLU Gets Worse

STACLU seems to be taking on new contributors. Unfortunately, the new ones don't seem to be any brighter or capable of rational thought than the old ones. Witness this post by Oak Leaf, which begins with this breathtakingly stupid statement:

Today, the ACLU attacked the Department of Defense and by default all uniformed members of the military of using "abusive interrogation practices" on prisoners taken in the Global War on Terror

Grammatical difficulties aside (the phrase "attacked...of using" is a nonsense phrase), who other than a deluded ideologue would think that accusing the Pentagon of creating an environment that encourages abuse of prisoners is an indictment of "all uniformed members of the military"? This is as ridiculous as the claim yesterday that saying there are members of racist hate groups in the military that shouldn't be there means that all soldiers are racists. Are these people just completely incapable of having a rational thought? What a tragic way to go through life.

Tags

More like this

Here's STACLU's latest exercise in irrationality, a post titled NY Times Paints US Military as a Bunch of Racists. The post is written by Ian from Expose the Left, but all he really does is expose his own lack of reasoning skills. He's up in arms about this article in the NY Times, which points out…
And finding more absurdity underneath. Oak Leaf, one of the new STACLU contributors, has a post about a Senate committee that heard testimony from JAG corps officers about how to proceed after the Hamdan decision, based upon this article in the New York Times. He begins by invoking the TV show JAG…
In perusing Jen Shroder's hysterical website, I came across this little gem, which I debunked back in January. It claims that this alleged terrorist, Alamoudi, helped write the guidelines on religion in schools that allows schools to induct kids into Islam. It's complete and utter nonsense, of…
STACLU has been busy adding new contributors lately. It appears that they've been seeking out every anti-ACLU crank they can find on the internet and asking them to post there. Unfortunately, the quality of the arguments and the level of intellectual honesty hasn't budged. A new contributor named…

10-15 Years ago Ralph Peters was someone respectable and responsible. It's embarrasing what he's become, but at least he's found an audience at the NY Post and the AEI.

He's quite influential among the military blockheads, and to read his stretegic ramblings you get the idea why the hole keeps getting dug deeper. Today's article is just one artifact in many.

Ralphie used to wear oak leaves. Maybe he's expanding his reach beyond NY?