Creationist Feedback

Email? Yeah, I get email. Some of it is even as funny as this one from someone named Ken Mayfield:

Creationist nonsense? You find it easier to believe that the perfect order around you is a culmination of chance, amoeba, and some ethereal intelligence called evolution.
Unbelievable

I think we may have found our Robert O'Brien Trophy winner for the month.

More like this

My new bestest friend Robert O'Brien sent me this charming email: Mr. Brayton, After reading your opining here and on PT, the most charitable description of you I can come up with is "a pompous ass, intoxicated with the sound of his braying." You frequently make my pretentious idiot list.…
Scott Foust, a german literature student at the University of Cincinatti, is the winner of February's Robert O'Brien Trophy (formerly known as the Idiot of the Month award) for this breathtakingly ignorant article in the newspaper of that university. In it, Foust takes the commonly heard, and…
I neglected to award a Robert O'Brien trophy for the month of March, so let me do so belatedly now. March's winner, for comments made in April, is Sen. John Cornyn of Texas. On the floor of the Senate yesterday, Cornyn delivered a ridiculous speech to an almost empty chamber in which he blamed the…
Just when you thought we'd heard the last of Utah's reigning ignoramus, State Senator Chris Buttars, President Bush's recent statements on ID seem to have brought him back to life. He's moving forward once again to root out the evils of evolution from Utah schools, and in the process he pretty much…

Ed, I respect your views but frankly I've been waiting for months for someone to put the rhetorical smackdown on your incessant claims that evolution is the result of "chance, amoeba, and . . . ethereal intelligence." Finally Ken Mayfield has made the airtight argument that has been on the minds of all your readers, waiting for a superior intellect like his to synthesize into the irrefutable monolith of convincitization you quoted. I trust you will no longer make your specious amoeba-based arguments, now that you have been shown the light.

By Fredrock Flintstone (not verified) on 04 Jul 2006 #permalink

The best post I've seen this month (on another forum) carefully explained how if reptiles lived for 1000 years and grew to be 180 feet long, they would be mistaken for dinosaurs.

He also told us that researchers involved in facial reconstruction (from old or fossil skulls) have been able to determine what human beings would have looked like when they lived to be 900 years old. To their shock (!) they found that around the 400 year mark, the image looked like that of Cro Magnum (sic) man and around the 800 year mark, the image looked remarkably like Neanderthal man.

I asked for a reference to that remarkable research. As you can guess, none is yet forthcoming, just a couple of Bible verses.

Creationist nonsense? You find it easier to believe that the perfect order around you is a culmination of chance, amoeba, and some ethereal intelligence called evolution. Unbelievable

Oooo, sorry Ken, close but no cigar. We actually believe the perfect order around us is a culmination of luck, mycoplasma, and an empyreal intelligence called evolution. Really, you were almost there.

Perfect order? What perfect order?

I'd agree that he probably should get the Robert O'Brien award, but it might be a bit early in the month to select winner just yet.

Yes, I agree with Raj - You should not underestimate the stupidity of a creationist. It is WAY too early to make the monthly SCA (Stupid Creationist Award).

Dawkins would respond by asking how it can possibly make sense for you to think it is impossible for life to come about without supernatural forces, but that it is entirely possible for there to be an omniscient, omnipotent, supernatural being that created life/made it possible.

It's simply an easy way out of trying to answer the question, which is understandable, because science is damn hard.

He also told us that researchers involved in facial reconstruction (from old or fossil skulls) have been able to determine what human beings would have looked like when they lived to be 900 years old. To their shock (!) they found that around the 400 year mark, the image looked like that of Cro Magnum (sic) man and around the 800 year mark, the image looked remarkably like Neanderthal man.

I had not heard that one yet. Thanks for the morning laugh.

I already knew what I wanted to post after reading this one and then raj beat me to it. This guy has a really strange idea of perfection.

By Jim Satterfield (not verified) on 05 Jul 2006 #permalink

Oh, so it wasn't the Flying Spaghetti Monster, it was amoeba! (Shouldn't it be capitalized, in that case?)

By Invigilator (not verified) on 05 Jul 2006 #permalink