ACLU Defends Southern Baptist Preacher

This is interesting. I wrote a few weeks ago about Lonnie Latham, the anti-gay minister who was arrested at a Southern Baptist Convention meeting for soliciting sex from an undercover police officer. In an interesting twist, the ACLU has filed an amicus brief in his case arguing that the ruling in Lawrence v Texas, which struck down state anti-sodomy laws, makes the law under which Latham was arrested unconstitutional as well:

"The Supreme Court [via the Lawrence v. Texas decision] had made it crystal clear that when it comes to their sex lives, consenting adults are free to do whatever they please in private," said Joann Bell, executive director of the ACLU of Oklahoma. "It is not a crime merely to invite someone to have completely lawful sex. If it were otherwise, every bar in the state may as well shut its doors."

And I think they're right. The police report says that Latham invited the undercover officer back to his hotel room for oral sex, but did not offer any money. That means it doesn't fall under prostitution laws and is simply one person trying to pick up another person for sex. Nothing illegal about that.

Tags

More like this

Jason links to this at PL and I had to comment here: An executive committee member of the Southern Baptist Convention was arrested on a lewdness charge for propositioning a plainclothes policeman outside a hotel, police said. Lonnie Latham, senior pastor at South Tulsa Baptist Church, was booked…
The story of North Carolina uber Christian Coy Privette, arrested on charges of aiding and abetting prostitution (being a "john") is, on its surface, just another tale of hypocrisy, one among many: Privette, the president of the Christian Action League in North Carolina, was charged July 19 with…
One of the frequent commenters at STACLU is a guy named Kerwin Brown. While bored, I followed a link to his blog and boy was that fun. He calls himself a "classical liberal" and calls his blog "Expressions of Liberty" while advocating laws against adultery and "fornication". That last post is just…
I decided to take a look and see if Justice Scalia had ever addressed the ruling of Loving v Virginia. It turns out, apparently, that he thinks the case was decided correctly, even while embracing the exact same argument made in that case by the state of Virginia. In his dissent in Lawrence, he…

The ACLU is pro gay rights.

By Ginger Yellow (not verified) on 03 Feb 2006 #permalink

Let me ask a question. Could someone challenge prostitution laws using Lawrence v. Texas?

By BillySixString (not verified) on 03 Feb 2006 #permalink

BillySixString wrote:

Could someone challenge prostitution laws using Lawrence v. Texas?

Quite possibly. I doubt it would win, but I think it probably should.

Yes, I know. I think I phrased that badly. What I was trying to say was that the "southern baptist preacher" part will be ignored and critics will focus on "gay" part and overlook the part where no laws were actually broken.

By afarensis (not verified) on 03 Feb 2006 #permalink

Quite possibly. I doubt it would win, but I think it probably should.
Why? What are those laws?

By Roman Werpachowski (not verified) on 03 Feb 2006 #permalink

Roman wrote:

Why? What are those laws?

Laws against prostitution, which is someone selling sex.