Abortion and the Fantasy-Based Community

It seems the liars at the National Review and their ideological brethren are having quite an effect on the rank and file, who have dutifully lined up to whoop and cry without bothering to actually put any thought into the matter. There's a surprise. The AP reports that Senate phone banks are being hammered by people insisting that Arlen Specter should not be named chairman of the Judiciary Committee for committing the outrageous sin of pointing out political reality:

Angry conservatives flooded Senate phone and fax lines on Friday demanding that Republicans prevent Sen. Arlen Specter from presiding over the Judiciary Committee after his comments predicting that strongly anti-abortion judicial nominees might be rejected in the Senate...

Senate offices said the response was intense. "We are getting slammed," said Mike Brumas, a spokesman for Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala. and a panel member. "Some of them are saying things like, they voted for values on Tuesday and this is a slap in the face."

An aide to Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, another Republican who sits on the Judiciary Committee, said the office was getting several calls a minute, a volume equal to the calls during consideration of the proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage.

It also reports that the Family Research Council sent out an email alert telling their supporters to call the Senate on this issue. Because, you see, Specter is part of the "reality-based community", while the FRC, the NRO and their followers are part of the "fantasy-based community". In SocialConservativeLand, where they live, the opposition just rolls over for whatever they want to pass, overwhelmed by the incredible 51% "mandate" from the voters. And in SocialConservativeLand, any mention that the opposition might not do so amounts to, as the National Review editors put it, "betrayal". It's a betrayal because people like these little fantasies and to intrude on them with reality, apparently, makes the baby Jesus cry.

Tags

More like this

As I noted yesterday, presumptive Senate Judiciary Chairman Arlen Specter has sparked a controversy that has been blown out of all proportion. The editors of the National Review appear to have lost their minds completely over what was, to any sane person, a very innocuous statement. It begins with…
I've said several times lately that the social conservatives, who are playing up the alleged "moral mandate" from the Presidential election, may well overplay their hand and end up getting smacked down by the electorate later for it. Here's a good example of why I think that. The religious right…
With the Bush administration, and Repbulicans generally, tanking in the polls, the time has come to do some serious pandering to the right-wing base. Expect to see a lot more articles like this one, from The Washington Post: A U.S. Senate panel advanced a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage…
Robert Novak has joined the chorus of dishonesty against Arlen Specter, emphatically repeating the outright lie that Specter said he would impose a litmus test on future judicial nominees that they must be pro-choice and that he said he would block potential appointments. Novak says: Sen. Arlen…