1. digitalbio
  2. Afterthoughts on the Life Sciences Summit

Afterthoughts on the Life Sciences Summit

By sporte on September 22, 2009.

This morning I attended the Fifth Annual WBBA Governor's Life Sciences Summit. The breakfast was great; the talks were okay. 

I do enjoy the stories about people who's lives were saved because of biotechnology and I agree that the focus of the summit, research and discovery are important, but I can't help thinking about the missing piece.

For the past ten years, I've been involved in a national experiment to help build an educated workforce for biotechnology. Through that time, I've learned about one glaring area where Washington state is missing out.

There's one word for the missing piece.

Bio-manufacturing

The absence is especially poignant with the news that Dendreon, one our local Seattle companies, plans to build their bio-manufacturing facility in Georgia. Over and over again, during the past twenty years I've seen this story repeat itself. A Washington research institution or company discovers something and manufactures the drug somewhere else.

I know bio-manufacturing doesn't sound sexy. It's not a flashy word like "discovery" or "innovation." But nobody gets to take those miracle drugs like Enbrel unless someone makes them. And, bio-manufacturing has jobs. There are far more jobs in bio-manufacturing than there are in research. Further, bio-manufacturing jobs have a broader rearch into a community because people can find bio-manufacturing jobs without having to get a Ph.D. or even in many cases, a bachelor's degree.

The lack of a Ph.D. requirement doesn't mean that bio-manufacturing jobs involve unskilled labor. Operating tissue culture robots, a FACs machine, or a DNA sequencing instrument does require specialized training. It's just that this training can be provided by a more diverse set of institutions in a shorter period of time to a wider group of people. Consequently, bio-manufacturing has a wider impact on a larger cross-section of the community.

It would be nice if our leaders in Washington state could see beyond the research institutions and consider how to encourage biotechnology beyond the research stage so that our community could benefit from the change to make biotech drugs, not just the opportunity to take them.

Tags
biotechnology
Science Education
seattle
biotechnology jobs
workforce education
Science Education

More like this

Blogging from Bio-Link
Blogging from Bio-Link, part I I am currently in Berkeley attending the 2006 Bio-Link summer fellows' workshop. It's hard to believe that it's been eight years since the first workshop was held. We're still meeting here in the same lovely Clark Kerr Center and I'm still, as every year, awed by the…
Workforce shortages in biotechnology, part II. How do we fill the pipeline?
In part I, I wrote about the shortage of technicians in the biotechnology industry and the general awareness that this problem is getting worse. This part will address the challenge of getting more students into programs that will prepare them for jobs in the biotech field. I've also been asked to…
Workforce shortages in biotechnology, part I. Why is this a problem?
Workforce shortages are a growing problem in the biotech industry. Communities are concerned that a lack of trained workers will either keep companies away or cause companies to move. If companies do have to move, it's likely those jobs might be lost forever, never to return. According to Robert…
Career pathways in biotechnology
Students in the United States take many convoluted and unnecessarily complicated paths when it comes to finding careers in biotechnology. If Universities and community colleges worked together, an alternative path could benefit all parties; students, schools, industry, and the community. The image…