1. denialism
  2. The Wall Street Journal, A Denialist Debunker?

The Wall Street Journal, A Denialist Debunker?

By choofnagle on May 9, 2007.

I'm a real fan of the Wall Street Journal. I read it on the BART every morning, to the displeasure of my knee-jerk co-passengers.

Why is the Journal awesome? Because days like today, you find reporting showing how branding is often an illusion, how cheaper printer cartridges are actually more expensive, and how formaldehyde is used as a preservative in Asia. Denialists may be reading the opinion page, but the rest of the paper seems to highlight the many difficulties and imperfections in the market--from insider trading to outrageous executive pay. All in the same day.

Back to the opinion page...it's crazy. The editors are infatuated with boogeymen. Today, they hit four of them: the IRS, Elliott Spitzer, the trial lawyers, and George Soros. And the facts asserted on it often differ from the reporting elsewhere in the paper. Going forward, I'm going to document examples of this, and I invite you to do so as well!

Tags
General Discussion

More like this

ScienceOnline2010 - interview with Ivan Oransky
Continuing with the tradition from last two years, I will occasionally post interviews with some of the participants of the ScienceOnline2010 conference that was held in the Research Triangle Park, NC back in January. See all the interviews in this series here. You can check out previous years'…
Environmentalists Must Face Down the Anti-Science in Their Own House
How can environmental groups and media outlets maintain that they are advocates of science, and not ideology, when they engage in the anti-science Luddism of GMO fearmongering? The potential of this anti-science behavior to poison their credibility on global climate change is real, as there is an…
Who are the denialists? (Part III)
Who are the global Warming Denialists? A tougher question is, in a discipline as complex as climate science, how do you tell who the legitimate skeptics (those that ignore the reporting at the Independent for instance) are versus who are the denialists? Again, it's simple, because denialism is…
Defining the Journalism vs. Blogging Debate, with a Science Reporting angle
You know I have been following the "death of newspapers" debate, as well as "bloggers vs. journalists" debate, and "do we need science reporters" debate for a long time now. What I have found - and it is frustrating to watch - is that different people use different definitions for the same set of…

The WSJ has long apparently had that strange editorial disconnect between the editorial pages and the news pages (and we're talking the real news pages, which are separate and in addition to the financial reporting). The editorial pages of the Journal (which gives the paper much of principle reputation) is so far out in left-field as to make Limbaugh seem like a wuss by comparison. Hey, that's why I don't want to be seen with it--much preferring the rightist-loathed New York Times.

By gary l. day (not verified) on 09 May 2007 #permalink

Better hope it isn't sold. The potential new owners wouldn't be able to help themselves in making the rest of the paper conform to the editorial page.