Mark Steyn, Creationist

Mark Steyn gets this email :

ARE YOU A CREATIONIST?

I enjoy your various articles in the Speccie, torygraph etc and agree with most of what you say and your support for Right views. But I am concerned with your right-wing mates in the US and UK who seem to be on the intelligent-design rubbish bandwagon. I hope you will distance yourself from them in future articles on this subject as there is no evidence for their views at all whereas evolution is supported by enormous volumes of evidence. You don't strike me as a creationist irrationalist.

And responds with:

The fact is that this is a planet overwhelmingly dominated and shaped by one species, and our kith and kin - whether gibbons or pumpkins - basically fit in in the spaces between. That's pretty much the world the Psalmist outlined in the Old Testament thousands of years ago. By comparison, the evolutionists' insistence that we're just another "animal" seems perverse and irrational and refuted by a casual glance out the window. I am coming round to the view that hyper-rationalism is highly irrational.

Tim Blair must reckon that Steyn is uneducated.

Update: PZ Myers writes about the hapless Steyn's ignorance of biology. Alan Adamson says that he has long enjoyed Steyn's writing but doesn't think that Steyn is worth reading any more after this.

Tags

More like this

In Sunday's post I wrote the following: People like [Kevin] Shapiro, George Will, or Charles Krauthammer are lonely voices in the conservative wilderness, accorded about as much respect in the Republican party as pro-lifers are in the Democratic party. Every conservative politican of any…
Recemtly there was a bit of a kerfuffle over at Virginia Commonwealth University regarding the bioogy textbook Essentials of Biology, Sylvia Mader. An adjunct biology professor at VCU protested that the book gave short shrift to evolution and was soft on creationism. I've not managed to locate a…
Town Hall columnist Michael Barone has a bee in his bonnet about universities: I am old enough to remember when America's colleges and universities seemed to be the most open-minded and intellectually rigorous institutions in our society. Today, something very much like the opposite is true:…
Matt Nisbet analyses George Will and Chris Mooney responds to some more recent discussions. Matt talks about framing on NPR (listen here) and now they both have an article published in the Washington Post. Also, check out some older articles by Matt and Chris, including this one on CSI and this…

The fact is that this is a planet overwhelmingly dominated and shaped by one species

I was trying to think what on earth Steyn meant by this. In terms of domination the general answer is "bacteria" and in terms of shaping the planet "plants", but it would be impossible to pick any species in particular.

I then clicked through and found Pharyngula having much the same thoughts.

I think it was the biologist JS Haldane who suggested that going by the evidence of Creation, all one could really say with any degree of conviction about God was that He liked beetles.

Reminds me of Emo Phillip's take on physiology: "I used to think the brain was the most interesting organ in the body. Then I thought 'Oh wait, look who's telling me this'".

Dsquared, I believe the quote was: "He(the Creator) seems inordinately fond of beetles."

By The Dark Avenger (not verified) on 02 Sep 2005 #permalink

Steyn is, and always has been, a complete nonentity who nitpicks others to death but cannot spot even the most glaring errors in his own arguments. Tu quoque is practically the only weapon he has ever wielded. When oh when will he go back to theatre criticism and stop making an idiot of himself.