Lott says that Mary Rosh was "based upon some type of truth"

Lott was on MSNBC's Buchanan & Press on May 26. From the transcript:

PRESS:
After that book came out, there was a person who showed up on the Internet by the name of Mary Rosh, who said you were the best professor she ever had in college. She praised the book in her review on the Internet. She said any critics of your book should slink away into a hole and hide. And it turns out this Mary Rosh is a total invention of yours.

Now, why should I believe anything you say in this book if you are lying to people on the Internet?

LOTT:
Well, first of all, not all of those were from me.
PRESS:
She doesn`t exist, does she?
LOTT:
I used a pseudonym in Internet discussions, in chat room discussions.
PRESS:
Doesn't that just destroy your credibility?
LOTT:
Well, nothing there was false, in the sense that everything I said about guns was correct. And even the other stuff was all based upon some type of truth. I originally used my own name in Internet discussions. But I would get phone calls from people who would be threatening and other types of things.

And, look, we all make silly mistakes from time to time. I admit that I did that.

So when "Mary Rosh" promoted Lott to a chaired professor:

"I had him for a class at the Wharton Business School where he was a chaired professor",

it wasn't a lie, but "based upon some type of truth". And when she wrote:

"There were a group of us students who would try to take any class that he taught. Lott finally had to tell us that it was best for us to try and take classes from other professors more to be exposed to other ways of teaching graduate material",

that was "based on some kind of truth" as well. And I'd really like to know the kind of "truth" that this:

I am 114 lbs. and 5'6".

and this:

Even if I am not wearing heels, I don't think that there are many men that I could outrun

were based on.

And some of Rosh's statements about guns were incontrovertibly false. For example,

These are not surveys for self defense as you claimed, but surveys involving any type of carrying guns for any reason (e.g., hunting, moving residences, etc.).

And the story about the threatening phone calls doesn't hold water, as I explained before.

Tags

More like this

Science has printed a letter from Lott (subscription required) responding to Science's editorial suggesting that the AEI should deal with Lott the same way that Emory dealt with Bellesiles: Donald Kennedy's editorial "Research fraud and public policy" (18 April, p. 393) alleges that I made up a…
This is an annotated list of John Lott's on line reviews at Amazon and at Barnes and Noble. Most of his reviews were posted anonymously or under a false name, and he used this anonymity to post many five-star reviews of his own books and to pan rival books. When you post a review at…
After finding some clues on Amazon's Canadian site that revealed three more of Lott's reviews, I decided to check their other sites. On their German site I found the review below. This review seems to have also been deleted when the Mary Rosh review was deleted. I think that was…
Howard Nemerov has a post defending Lott and responding to Chris Mooney's Mother Jones article. Unfortunately, he gets his facts wrong, leaves out inconvenient facts and indulges in fallacious arguments. I'll go through his post and correct these, but first some general comments. Even…