Handgun accidents vs long gun accidents

A handgun is four times as likely
to be involved in an accidental wounding as a long gun.

Dr. Paul H. Blackman writes:

I believe the discussions on accidents with long guns vs.
handguns sometimes vary from numbers of handguns vs.
numbers of long guns, to numbers of the respective guns
which are regularly stored readily accessible (loaded and/or
unlocked). (Part of the reasoning being that if one assumes
folks will keep a gun for protection, and will keep said gun
loaded, which sorts of loaded guns will do more damage --
are more apt to be involved in injuries, and, if involved,
are more apt to do more serious harm.)

I have seen some discussion along these lines in Kates' TLR paper.
Unfortunately, Kates is grossly misleading on this topic. If you want to see
whether handguns kept loaded all the time are safer than long guns kept loaded,
then you need to know

  1. What fraction of guns kept loaded are handguns

  2. What fraction of injuries (or deaths) involving guns kept loaded
    are inflicted with handguns.

Fraction 1 is difficult enough to determine. Kates asserts that it is "90% or
more" and that it is "85.2%". I get a very rough estimate of about
80% from surveys of gun owners storage practices.

There just isn't any data on fraction 2. Kates instead uses the
fraction for handgun involvement in ALL accidental fatalities, which
he asserts is less than 14%. This is clearly incorrect. People can
still have fatal accidents with guns that are not kept loaded all the
time. Moreover, Kates deliberately mislead his readers when he
claimed that handgun involvement in accidental gun deaths was less
than 14%. In fact, it is about 50%. Most of the time, the type of
the gun is "unknown". To get his "less than 14%" figure Kates makes the
absurd assumption that NONE of these unknown guns are handguns. If we
assume that the unknown guns are like the known ones, we discover that
about half of fatal gun accidents involve handguns.

I don't know where the four times more likely comes from.
NEISS data would suggest handguns are involved in over half
of accidental woundings,

about two-thirds

and other data would suggest that
handguns comprise roughly one-third of the stock of
privately owned firearms. Does that work out to four times
the involvement?

Yes. Twice as many wounds, half as many guns, 2x2=4.

Tags

More like this

I was curious to see what kind of defense Matt would put on against my suggestion of additional regulations to address the problem of gun violence and homicide in the US, and I was a bit disappointed to see that the response is largely a "no problem" argument. I had actually come into this debate…
Why you have to do something about guns This message is primarily for those living in the United States. In the US, we have an outdated Constitutional amendment that has been interpreted by many, including the courts, in a way that hampers effective legislation to address what is clearly a major…
As you know, I often mention reports from the Ohh Shoot blog, which chronicles the virtually daily instances of someone doing something accidental with a gun and the associated serious wounding or killing of one or more other individuals. These events are not part of the large number of suicides…
Happy Gun Appreciation Day! Let's spend a little time to appreciate guns. Because this is the very first Gun Appreciation Day! I'm not sure why we've never had a Gun Appreciation Day before, but now that we have one let's celebrate with a review of the last month's interesting stories about guns…