1. cortex
  2. Proust in Wired

Proust in Wired

By cortex on October 22, 2007.

My book got a very nice little spread in the new Wired. There's a picture of me at an uncomfortable zoom and a short Q&A:

Q: Do you really think that we'll find answers to science's Big Questions in the arts?

A: Virginia Woolf isn't going to help you finish your lab experiment. What she will do is help you ask your questions better. Proust focused on problems that neuroscience itself didn't grapple with until relatively recently - questions of memory that couldn't be crammed into Pavlovian reinforcement: Why are memories so unreliable? Why do they change so often? Why do we remember only certain aspects of the past?

For context on the odd Kanye West allusion, look here. On a related note, Ted over at Bookeywookey has written a few generous and illuminating posts on Proust Was A Neuroscientist. Thanks so much Ted!

Tags
Uncategorized

More like this

My Awkward Introduction
Writing the first line of your first blog is even harder than starting to write a book. Blogging is an instantaneous conversation, and nobody wants to begin a conversation with a bad beginning. (Plus, you can always change the first line of your book, at least until it's published, and that takes…
While students do forensics, I dissect the class
The blood typing lab, part I. What went wrong? and why? Blood typing part II. Can this laboratory be saved? Those wacky non-major Zoo students are at it again! And this time they drew blood! Mike's undergraduate students learned about blood typing, a common tool of detectives and real crime TV…
The Making of "Squeezed States in a Bose-Einstein Condensate"
Yesterday's write-up of my Science paper ended with a vague promise to deal some inside information about the experiment. So, here are some anecdotes that you would need to have been at Yale in 1999-2000 to pick up. We'll stick with the Q&A format for this, because why not? Why don't we start…
Graduation Speech: Think Like a Scientist
The following is the (approximate) text of the speech I gave Friday night at the Whitney Point High School graduation. Or, at least, this is what I typed out for myself Thursday night-- what actually comes out of my mouth on Friday might be completely different. That's why they do these things live…

I´m planning to submit to Oxford graduate studies a research statement for the philosophy department entitled : Neurohistory of philosophy "of" consciousness" which try to reveal how authors from the past have been anticipating, implicitely, or even explicitely, the very advances made by neuroscience concerning conciousness.
It is fantastic to know (via mindhacks.com) that what its call neurohistory (how scientific breakthroughs are anticipated by intellectuals before an objective measure finally will confirm them, the backward approach in neurohistory, because there is a forward approach that deals with drawing a new vocabulary for our conceptual framework while neuroscience discover new facts to udnerstand the mind/brain) its at the center or is the main point of your book.
I can´t wait to buy it!

I was guessing the title of your next book would be "All fiction is gadget fiction."

By Gary Coulter (not verified) on 26 Oct 2007 #permalink

...Am about halfway through the Proust chapter and just saw the picture of the page proof with all of the edits and paperoles; I can't help but wonder what Proust would have made of collaborative writing spaces so characteristic of Web2.0 today. I wonder what form a text like Search would have taken had it been written in a Wiki (or some other form of collaborative document creation)
I suspect that there is a lot of thinking to be done around how such collaborative spaces effect our personal (and our collective) memories.

By Christopher (not verified) on 13 Nov 2007 #permalink