The Adaptive Unconscious

Your unconscious brain is better at processing information than you are. Here's Ap Dijksterhuis:

We gave our subjects information pertaining to a choice--for example, which of four apartments was the most attractive, or which of four cars was the best. They had three options: They could make a choice immediately; they could take time for conscious deliberation; or they could figuratively sleep on it--that is, engage in unconscious thought. The subjects who chose the third option were first given information about the decision in question and then given information about an unrelated task, to occupy their conscious minds while their unconscious minds processed the relevant information.

When the unconscious thinkers were asked to choose one of the alternatives, they made better decisions, almost without exception, than the subjects who decided immediately or those who consciously deliberated. Their decisions were better from a normative perspective (more rationally justifiable), from a subjective perspective (more likely to produce post-choice satisfaction), and from an objective perspective (more accurate, as in predictions of soccer-match outcomes).

The moral? Use your conscious mind to acquire all the information you need for making a decision--but don't try to analyze the information. Instead, go on holiday while your unconscious mind digests it for a day or two. Whatever your intuition then tells you is almost certainly going to be the best choice.

For more on this type of research, read this book. (It's like Blink, only better.)

Tags

More like this

Elections are weighing heavily on our minds. In three short months, America will see the race between Barack Obama and John McCain come to a head, while we in Britain will probably have a general election within the next few years. Some people, of course, will vote based on long-held loyalties to…
Whether it's a goalkeeper who needs to decide which way to dive, or a motorist who needs to swerve to avoid a pedestrian, people often have to make decisions in a small amount of time, based on a complex onrush of information. But even as their muscles launch them towards one particular fate, there…
Last month, a paper was published in Nature, in which Kay et al(1) were able to guess which of their stimuli a person was seeing by looking at their fMRI scans. The model looked something like this (from Kay et al's Figure 1, p. 352): The image the participant is seeing is on the left, the numbers…
Our brains are shaping our decisions long before we become consciously aware of them. That's the conclusion of a remarkable new study which shows that patterns of activity in certain parts of our brain can predict the outcome of a decision seconds before we're even aware that we're making one. It…

Your unconscious brain is better at processing information that you are.

I should make you define "you."

By Mustafa Mond, FCD (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

It would probably more accurate to refer to different thought processes rather than "unconscious brain" and "you." After all, the conscious mind is nothing more than a figment of the unconscious mind's imagination.

My attempt at ironic humor clearly didn't work. Of course, "you" emerge from an amalgam of unconscious and conscious brain processes. (As Mark notes, the conscious self depends upon the machinations of the unconscious brain.) I was simply trying to point out that there are parts of our brain that we have no conscious access to that can process information and make decisions better than our consciousness.

I am very happy to find someone like you that writes about science so well... I was doing research about neurogenesis, and by chance I found your article about Liz Gould. Let me tell you, not even my advisor was able to tell me the story about neurogenesis as well as you did!!

thank you

Jimena

By Jimena Sandoval (not verified) on 01 Feb 2007 #permalink

what is the evidence that the so-called unconscious thought is indeed a thought? i remember gerd gigerenzer once proposed a theory of simple heuristics, which i think could also explain the empirical findings presented here. the moral is more parsimonious: think, but not too much.