Yeah, last Friday I threatened a sequel and here it is.
Too much fun. And once again, looking in the mirror is a bit tough on this one. I did do a quick search on my blog posts and none of the offending phrases shows up per se. But, some seem a little too familiar.
I'm not done with the douchebags.
After I wrote the 5 Signs You're Talking To A Social Media Douchebag, I was met with heavy feedback.
Social media douchebags used social media to attack me.
Damn it.
Should've seen that one coming.
Here goes. Read 'em and weep for the future of humanity. The elaborations on the original post are well worth checking out.
- "Participate In The Conversation"
- "Monetize Your Social Media Presence"
- "Social Media Rockstar"
- "You're Doing It Wrong."
- "Social Media Is All About ..."
(Once again, it's all Walt Crawford's fault. Blame him if this cuts a little too close to home. I know I do.)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
This is soooo funny. So funny it hurts. Ok, so maybe I've been guilty of one or two of these. Ok, maybe you have too. The more you're guilty, the funnier it is.
To many, the Internet is a world full of promise.
To others, a ripe field ready to be harvested by douchebags.
Both are true.
I think…
I'm still enjoying my informal, semi-serious, so-funny-it-hurts Friday Fun series on the slings and arrows of online social media/networking practices.
The first three have been:
5 Signs You're Talking To A Social Media Douchebag
5 Terms Social Media Douchebags Need To Stop Using
5 Things Serious…
Today's Friday Fun continues the curious informal summer series of light-hearted takes on social media/network etiquette, begun two weeks ago with 5 signs you're talking with a social media douchebag and last week with 5 terms social media douchebags need to stop using.
This time around it's 5…
I chose this one more for the humourous title of the post since the content itself is very seriously intentioned.
I almost see this as a double sequel to both the social media evilness post and to some of my recent ramblings on thought leadership.
The post in question is We Don't Need No Steenkin'…