"Blink" methods now being applied in the classroom

Malcolm Gladwell's book Blink -- and the real research it was based on -- made quite a splash when it was unveiled: the idea that a teacher evaluation made in just 30 seconds could actually reliably predict teacher performance over an entire semester was certainly surprising.

The Charlotte Observer has an excellent article about how the methods pioneered by Ambady and Rosenthal are being applied in real high school classrooms. Rather than 30 seconds, principals take 3 minutes to assess each teacher's performance, to catch problems early and intervene before they adversely affect the classroom:

The three-minute technique builds on what many principals do naturally -- pop into classes, praise what's working and talk about what's not."The principal is perceived as a partner, rather than an inspector," said retired Iowa State professor William Poston, one of the creators of the program.

The book, published about five years ago, spells out what principals should look for and argues for making regular pop-ins a top priority.

Interim Superintendent Frances Haithcock brought the technique to CMS in 2005, as a judge cranked up pressure to improve teaching in low-scoring high schools.

Several studies have found the walk-throughs improve student achievement and behavior, as well as teachers' relationship with their supervisors, Poston says. Researchers found the technique encourages teachers to trade low-level classroom strategies, such as worksheets and lectures, for more effective approaches, such as one-on-one contact and helping students discover information on their own.

If walk-throughs reveal consistent problems -- out-of-control behavior, tuned-out students or teachers who aren't covering required material, for instance -- the principal can step in quickly. A teacher might get extra training in classroom management, for instance, or on how to create more stimulating lessons.

"If one day the principal is in there and it's awful, that's not a problem," says Harrill. "If every day it's awful, that's a trend."

The key, of course, isn't the three-minute walkthrough. It's clear that's plenty of evidence for a principal to use to determine if a teacher is doing his job. The hard part is making ineffective teachers better, once it's known that what they're doing isn't working.

In other news:

Tags
Categories

More like this

One of the supposed key innovations in educational 'reform' is the adoption of value added testing. Basically, students are tested at the start of the school year (or at the end of the previous year) and then at the end of the year. The improvement in scores is supposed to reflect the effect of…
By way of Observational Epidemiology, we find an interesting NY Times article by Michael Winerip describing a seventh grade teacher's experience with value added testing in New York City. I'll get to value added testing in a bit, but the story also highlights why we need more reporters who have…
I'm not a fan of charter schools: they typically 'cherry pick' the best students, and then claim spectacular results (if they can do so at all), while paying teachers less and expected them to work even harder. However, here's one charter school trying something that I hope works--paying teachers…
And they don't appear to actually fix anything either. From The Washington Post: But Duncan reiterated his commitment to testing and accountability: "I will always give NCLB credit for exposing achievement gaps and for requiring that we measure our efforts to improve education by looking at…