Why can't journalists call it as it is?

Researchers Hope Obama Team Will Reinvigorate Role of Science Adviser:

In recent years, though, some critics have charged that the science adviser's influence has reached another low under President George W. Bush....

"Some critics"? Like, the entire scientific community? The entire science blogosphere? All the science journalists? Because of the obvious fact that the Bush Presidency is the pinnacle of the Republican disdain for reality, empiricism and science. Governing from the gut instead of from the brain. Governing by listening to direct messages from the Lord.

Because the conservative worldview is this:

The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." ... "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality--judiciously, as you will--we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."

There, fixed it for you...

More like this

A recent Harris Poll found that 50% of Americans polled now say Iraq had weapons of mass destruction when it was invaded (up from 36% in 2005) and 64% say Saddam had "strong links" with al Qaeda. In other news, huge numbers of Americans have no "strong links" with reality. And the administration…
I've never heard of Alex Beam before, which is a good thing — he seems to be some kind of journalist at the Boston Globe, and that's about all I know about him, other than that he seems to be an oblivious idiot. He has a column up in which he rages about the phrase "knowledge-based", apparently…
The Apple Pro-Sessions Science Blogging panel is done, and jolly good fun it was too. Good crowd, very good questions and decent banter - interesting to meet the various sciblings, including the ringers in the crowd. The last question, and I paraphrase, was interesting: "What one thing should the…
You really have to have a look at this column, from David Limbaugh, posted at Town Hall. It is simply not to be believed. The title: Leftist Thought Control. I'd respond to Limbuagh's arguments but for the fact that he doesn't provide any. Instead he simply makes assertion after assertion about…

some critics

This is exactly at the root of why the profession of journalism is completely utterly dead, gone, and rotting. Journalists have become lazy fucks who continually abdicate their duty to FIND OUT THE MOTHERFUCKING FACT OF THE MATTER, and instead rely on fake-ass balance between competing narratives.

This plays right into the hand of the sick-fuck right-wing, as all they have to do is trot out some phony propaganda shill, and the dumbfuck "journalists" go all "while it has been asserted that X, some critics say that not X", without doing even the slightest bit of investigation that would reveal to them that the OVERFUCKINGWHELMING CONSENSUS among people who know what the fuck they are talking about, and are not either deranged wackaloon fuckwits or intentional propagandists, is "not X".

Simply another example of the "false dichotomy" that we've had to live with for the last eight years, in which ignorant PBS journalists try yet again to hoe the non-existent "middle ground".

Also, another example of why I stopped donating to PBS and NPR. The politicization of PBS is reminiscent of the complete GOP takeover of the American Red Cross.

By Portofinoan (not verified) on 27 Dec 2008 #permalink