1. clock
  2. Open Access at Harvard

Open Access at Harvard

By clock on February 15, 2008.

When Harvard does something, all the others follow. Perhaps this is the tipping point for Open Access as a whole. Peter Suber and Gavin Baker have the best commentary and all the links to other worthy commentary in a series of posts worth studying:

More on the imminent OA mandate at Harvard
Harvard votes yes
Text of the Harvard policy
Roundup of commentary on Harvard OA policy
More on the Harvard OA mandate
Stevan Harnad's proposed revisions to the Harvard policy
Three on the Harvard OA mandate
More comments on the Harvard OA mandate

Also read Revere: Unfettered access to scientific work via open access publication

Perhaps the Millennium Conference at Harvard last fall was the straw that broke the camel's back. A lot of key Harvard people were there, hearing the arguments for and against OA and they, apparently, decided that the arguments For won the day. Also, it is nice to see that this effort was bottom-up, coming from faculty, and not a top-down decree.

Tags
open science

More like this

Library Access to Scholarship
I rarely mention here when Walt Crawford publishes a new issue of his very fine ejournal Cites & Insights, mostly because I sort of assume you all read it already. Of course, that's probably not true so I'll remedy the situation partially with this post. The most recent issue is completely (…
Reading Diary: Open Access by Peter Suber
Scholars who grew up with the internet are steadily replacing those that grew up without it. Scholars who expect to put everything they write online, who expect to find everything they need online, and who expect unlocked content that they may read, search, link, copy, cut/paste, crawl, print, and…
Is it ok to get paid to promote Open Access?
The title of this post might be a bit misleading. I don't really think it's much of a question. Of course it's ok to get paid to promote open access. My university pays me to be a librarian. I have faculty status. I can decide what I think are the most important issues in my field. I can advocate…
On the Nature of PLoS....
I know that you know that I work for PLoS. So, I know that a lot of you are waiting for me to respond, in some way, to the hatchet-job article by Declan Bucler published in Nature yesterday. Yes, Nature and PLoS are competitors in some sense of the word (though most individual people employed by…

I'm absolutely thrilled about this, of course. But I do think that more scientists need to realise that this is not just about posting pdf files of their published papers. Open Access implies a wider commitment to on-line communication, one that few scientists are as yet all that engaged with. (It's a time sink, I know, but...)

Example: a couple of weeks ago I posted a (slightly off-hand) comment on the British Medical Journal's rather good website. No reaction. Then the BMJ reprinted it in its print edition (minus a url reference), and I was deluged with e-mails. Among scientists, paper still rules.