Yay, NASA Senior Review is out:
tl;dr - everyone is above average, they're good enough and we like you.
Mission ranks
bad news: per AAAC meeting earlier, there is not enough $ to actually pay for all these lovely toys, so something will have to give, somewhere.
Someone at a high enough pay grade to take the blame will decide whether to cut from the bottom or give everybody a haircut.
Early tealeaf readings are haircuts all around.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
It was NASA proposal season last month, meant to comment on it, but was so exhausted and pissed off about the whole thing that I needed some space.
A typical proposals is 15 pages of main text; including biblio, bios, associated documents and blurbs the final (electronic) package is typically 40-55…
More repeats from Ye Olde Blogge
So you want to be an astrophysicist?
You've suffered through 3-4 years of undergrad, and you're ready for more.
You picked the places to apply to (or have you...?), and you're ready for the paperwork.
So what do you do. First you apply to the departments. As a rule…
So you want to be an astrophysicist?
You've suffered through 3-4 years of undergrad, and you're ready for more.
You picked the places to apply to (or have you...?), and you're ready for the paperwork.
Another lightly retouched blast from the past...
So what do you do?
First you apply to the…
I've been away all day, shuttling family about, so I've been trying to catch up the ongoing drama in the conflict between those simpering accommodationists and us mean new atheists. If you've got a little time — there is a bit of tl;dr about it all — read Sam Harris's exchanges with Philip Ball.…
My take of the senior review website is that the official NASA response authorizes all missions for extensions; those decisions do indeed take into account the budget. The response notes which missions have had additions or reductions to their budgets. So no missions will be turned off.