NASA cuts

So, got confirmation of initial round of cuts.

NASA HQ is preparing for budget problems by starting to pull back funds already allocated, in anticipation of fiscal year 2010-11 cuts. Between possible government shutdown, and the uncertainty over the Senate response to the House cuts, and a possible veto, it is hard to know what the funding will be in the end, or indeed if there will be any guidance on what to cut.

So...

Major cuts to current ongoing mission operations and data analysis.

Specifcally, Swift and Chandra are cut. I hear three other missions are also cut, but don't know which. Anyone heard?
That is just in Astrophysics, no word on other Science directorates. Yet.
This will hurt.
Earth Science will undoubtedly also take a hit, and the House will go after them further for 2012.

Also heard that W-FIRST is off the table, not going to happen (unless of course Congress line items it); also no EUCLID participation.
In fact no major new mission pipelined for the foreseeable future.

Next question is what Congress will do with JWST, sitting out there all by itself as a separate line item within Science. It will make a tempting target for budget cutters looking for trophies.

I've also heard of some individual PI grants being deobligated for this fiscal year, already - no rescission yet, that I've heard of, money disbursed stays, but remaining portion of grant for this year is not being disbursed. Anecdotally, from a science agency not to be specified at this point.

Interesting times.

More like this

IXO and LISA are dead and disbanded as NASA missions. We are looking at a very thin pipeline and few new missions for a while, unless there is drastic new direction from above and strong guidance on funding. NASA is a mission oriented agency. This is especially true of Astrophysics. At any given…
The American Physical Society just woke up to the budget threat... To cut a long story short, the US Government has no budget for 2010-2011. It has been operating under a continuous resolution since Oct 1, and this expires in March. The House, which originated budget resolutions, generally, wants…
It was NASA proposal season last month, meant to comment on it, but was so exhausted and pissed off about the whole thing that I needed some space. A typical proposals is 15 pages of main text; including biblio, bios, associated documents and blurbs the final (electronic) package is typically 40-55…
Every other year NASA conducts a Senior Review of its astrophysics missions that have completed their nominal mission and are requesting an extension of their mission. The 2012 review panel just reported. The panel had an interesting task - to rank in priority the operating missions: Chandra…

I can see WFIRST being off the table, but how sure are Swift/Chandra shutdowns?

By FuturePostdoc (not verified) on 21 Feb 2011 #permalink

Are you sure that this is in response to Congress rather than an attempt to find more money for JWST ?

The administration's FY12 budget noted that GALEX and Suzaku would cease operations at the end of FY11.

By Keith Arnaud (not verified) on 21 Feb 2011 #permalink

Keith, things were tight but there was money, at least for Explorers, up to now. They found a couple extra million for at least one smaller program, all "contingent on expected funding from Congress". AFAICT, this is really a response to congress. Guess it's time for tea.

@FP - Swift and Chandra are not shut down, the MODA funds are cut, for this year, not next.

@Keith - the word is that this is heading off Congress and the unknown size of the actual final cut. Clearly it shelters JWST for now

Tea has been served, not we'll see what the Senate has to say.

Ooops.
I am reliably informed that I confounded two separate issues, despite trying to keep them clearly separate.

Some of the cuts I heard about as coming now are in fact the cuts in next fiscal year, assuming budget is as proposed by the President, which it won't be.

The current fiscal year cuts are still uncertain, of course, because the Senate has not acted yet. Also, it is not clear, for example for NASA, if they'll be allowed to stop paying for the solid rocket booster development for the canceled Constellation mission - that is almost a $1B in the continuing resolution and if halted would save $500M, there is also language directing cuts to Center operations, in which case most of the cuts would be contained to Center contractors, and less would cascade to the PI level.

But, the Senators to like their Centers, and that is likely to be changed.