O wad some Power the giftie gie us

"...To see oursels as ithers see us!
It wad frae monie a blunder free us
An foolish notion:"

Yes, everyone has linked the latest, greatest XKCD:



So painful, so true.

Fortunately the other thing about physicists, is that we have a great sense of humour.
And we need it.

Steve Hsu has been doing some provocative ruminating along these lines.

This of course leads to classification of physicists, there being two types:

Type I is smart.
Type II is hard working.

Type Ib/c is smart and hard working, and therefore really sub-category of Type II
while Type Ia is smart but lazy.

Type IIn is hard working but smart,
and there is no other Type II

From which we conclude that smarts and hard work do not commute.

Interestingly, physicists are not the only field with the capacity for introspection and analysis:

The Big Picture provides a similar perspective on finance:



click to embiggen

More like this

stars do turn, sometimes fast enough to be noticeably flattened this may have consequences Like So there are two issues related to stellar rotation contemplated this morning: Altair now, way flatter than that... self-enrichment - back to the good old O/Na anti-correlation evidence for H…
Gleðileg Jól! Another blast from the past of Ye Olde Blogge You're in grad school. Yay. Now wtf do you do... Well, you need to jump through the hurdles first. Most places have some course and seminar requirements, you may in some cases test out of them or waive them, but think about whether you…
Somewhere out there, in some splendid ivory tower, a Professor of Theoretical Law is working on a new Grand Theory of the Unified Executive, which he hopes will overturn the increasingly obsolete Standard Model of three independent sources of Law, Justice and Executive Power (who ordered those…
A couple of years ago, a group of California theorists came up with a whacky theory for a new kind of thermonuclear supernova. It would be just like regular type Ia supernovae, but fainter and faster, and a bit more mixed up, as evidenced by its new label: the 0.Ia supernova, a perfect mallogos…

I don't know if I agree with this classification system. The first classes should be distinguished by the easiest observable: hard working vs. lazy. Self-classification of smart tends to be systematically biased (besides the imposters). I for one, know I'm lazy 99% of the time.