AIuGh

New York Attorney General Cuomo writes a letter to Congress.
He is not amused at American International Group.

Cuomo, in his capacity as overseer on NY insurance companies has been making enquiries, and kindly asked AIG not to distribute bonuses to its finance group last year out of the deferred compensation fund, which they agreed to, something to do with de facto bankrupt companies not being allowed to pay bonuses,
so they paid to bonuses out of the retention fund instead
duh.

Cuomo would like to know who and how much.
AIG is stalling.

NY State lawyers seem somewhat dubious about the legality of these bonuses and would like to hear more. They are particularly intrigued by the fact that the 2008 contracts guaranteed bonuses at least as large as the 2007 bonuses, even though AIG (Financial Group) surely knew at the time that their business was maybe not quite performing as well.

73 people received retention bonuses of over $1 million.
11 of these have left AIG, including one who got a $4.6 million bonus.

I'm sure they paid the retention bonus back when they left, right?

Letter is here it is worth a read

Sounds like Cuomo intends to name names etc and so forth.

In the mean time, AIG is apparently increasing corporate security.

Is it unusual to see such blatant theft in public.
It will be interesting to see if they get away with it.

As a matter of principle of policy this could be the lynchpin episode in the sordid mess that the financiers made.
I like to think some line will be held somewhere and that we collectively won't just continue to roll over and let the bastards walk away.
Again.

Tags

More like this

If there were ever an argument for high income tax rates on large incomes (i.e., greater than five million), AIG is making it. The arrogance of its executives, even after a bailout, can only be called by its true name--corruption (italics mine): NEW YORK (Reuters) - American International Group,…
Update: My praise for Charlie Rangel in this post was, sadly, premature. Politico is now reporting that Rangel has gotten behind a 91% tax bracket for AIG bonuses. When it comes to the AIG bonuses, I'm about as angry as any other taxpayer who has been paying attention. This morning, I was…
If the US assumes liability for Credit Default Swaps issued by financial institutions, its potential exposure is many times its gross domestic product. If the US does not take on this liability it risks annihilation of the modern financial system. The only solution is to seize both sides.…
It's not all that often I agree with Mike Dunford politically, but in writing about the AIG bonuses he's right. The bonuses ought to stay with the executives who were paid them. Neither congress nor the president ought to try to tax these bonuses back. Now obviously no executive at a failing bank…

Talking Points Memo reported yesterday that the FBI and the UK authorities (AIG's financial products division is based in London) have active investigations into AIG. As usual, the FBI will neither confirm nor deny that they are investigating.

Geithner and Summers have not handled this well. I expect them to get out of Washington sometime this summer, a few steps ahead of the mob bringing tar and feathers.

By Eric Lund (not verified) on 18 Mar 2009 #permalink

While we're on the topic of returning money spent by AIG, anyone want to estimate the probability that Barry Obama will return the $107332 he received in campaign contributions from said financial institution? How about Chuckie Schumer's $111875? Or Max Baucus's $90000? Or Hillary's $59515? And let's not forget the $15750 given to AGW crusader and self-proclaimed internet creator Al Gore.

Anyone?

Lest you think I'm picking on Democrats, I'll also point out that George W. Bush received $200560, John Sununu $69049 and Rudy Giuliani $50250, among many others.

Any wonder this company was bailed out?