KITP: grb II

yesterday I missed the post-Newtonian discussion, which is a bummer, but I was busy explaining to a hoard of pre-Ks why Mars looked green...
so now we go back to blowing things up

yes, it turns out that not all whites are the same, and trying to project onto that shade of white which has just a tint of blue in it, is not the same as your eggwhite screen, when using an RGB projector.

I should have riffed on Kim Stanley Robinson, I guess, but I didn't.

Look!
Hubble Space Telescope! Astronauts! Rockets! Aliens!

Today, we return to massive binaries and long GRBs in particular, which lets me recoup my Total Loss of Notes from last week...

Ed is on deck, and has resummarised nicely.

Long GRBs

duration: 2-hundreds of secs

Lorentz factors: Γ ~ 300-1000

Jets: opening angles of ~ 5 degrees, total energies of 1051-52 ergs

Related to peculiar type Ic supernovae. Which have explosive energies of order 1052 ergs.

No H, He
C/O core greater than 6 solar masses.
Outflow velocities of 30,000-50,000 km/sec

Typical redshifts of 1-3
Maximum observed redshift 6.7 - many with no known redshift.
Lowest redshift 0.0008



1998 bw

Model: collapsar - relativistic jet from a forming black hole with a hyperaccreting torus,

Requires: specific core angular momentum of 3-20 * 1010 cm2/s

Rate of type GRBs is about 0.0001 that of core-collpase supernovae.



I Zw 18 - low Z blue irregular

Host galaxies

(cf Fruchter et al 2006)

41 out of 42 : Irregular dwarf galaxies - dwarf starbursts (blue)

Long GRBs fall on brightest unresolves spots within galaxies - clumps of massive O and WR stars - superstar clusters

=> LGRBs originate from most massive stars: O/WR progenitors

- Never seen in ULIRGs (Ultra Luminous InfraRed Galaxies)
- something like > 50% of all star formation appears to take place in ULIRGs at intermediate redshifts (z ~ 1-3) [ed. need a cite on this]
-- basically at these redshift the L* galaxies are dominant
-- NB extinction of optical counterparts must be an issue to some extent
-- is XRB localization adequate and seen for enough of sample that we know that the "dark" bursts aren't just all obscured LGRBs in ULIRGs? - yes, apparently we have enough X-ray burst localizations that have no optical counterparts to know that most of the dark bursts can't by in ULIRGs. Interesting.

-- ULIRGs have metallicities of about solar,

So we infer that Long GRBs are related to star formation at sub-solar metallicity
the blue dwarf irregular have metallicities of more like 0.1 solar

Signs of low Z
All hosts have Ly α emission
- very low extinction of afterglows (but; dark bursts???)
- Z up to 1/3 of solar (1998 bw)

Are all metals equal? We don't really mean scaled solar abundance when we talk
about low Z, nor do we probably care that much about Fe as it happens.
So are we talking O? CNO? Alphas? All s-process?
We gots to knows.

Models: single star -> fully mixed evolution -> He4

binary -> H/He envelope removed by mass transfer
rapid rotation due to tidal coupling

Need a low mass companion?
High mass helium core with short orbital period companion?
Narrow range of orbital periods and masses that works, but that is ok.
Need only 1/10,000 of big stars to do this.
But is this channel too rare?
Hard to get a handle on our local population because we don't know the duty cycle of the activity of the descendant black hole binary, assuming that is the channel.

Go through something like Cyg X-3?

Where does low Z come in?
Probably in J coupling to envelope - need to lose H/He either by blowing off envelope, which needs some metals, or by rotational mixing, which may need Z below some critical.
This is a hard problem...

Lo Z so that we have low enough envelope mass loss that the He core is massive enough?
Yet again we are then reduced to rotation and magnetic fields...

In the other room, I just missed Juan Maldacena's talk on Fundamental Aspects of String Theory, or some such. I'll put a link to the video tonight or tomorrow.

Tags

More like this

All day discussion on white dwarfs today: cooling, kinematics, destruction etc Starts off with Lars tutoring us in the morning... Basics: white dwarf origins - they are degenerate burnt out cores of low-to-medium mass main seqeunce stars key issues still not fully resolved: what is the…
Final session of ExSSII on Earths, Super-Earths and Habitability liveblogging: Dimitar Sasselov - high density exoplanets HAT-P-20b - 14 gm/cc - hot 7 M_J giant planet, no prob modeling as degenerate H/He core Kepler-10b - 9 gm/cc - rocky Earth's central density 13 gm/cc Super-Earths expected…
"You cannot, in human experience, rush into the light. You have to go through the twilight into the broadening day before the noon comes and the full sun is upon the landscape." -Woodrow Wilson Without a doubt, one of the most spectacular light shows of the cosmos happens when stars burn out --…
“It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn’t feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.” -Neil Armstrong This past week saw a whole lot of interesting things happen, including…

Steinn, what do you think of the( non-standard) cannon ball model of GRBs. One of the proponents of
this model De Rujula (who is a visiting faculty at BU) has given many physics colloquia and HEP seminars on this model and some of these talks
which are archived on video. (see
here and
here
Does this model really agree as well with observations as claimed by these authors
(or are there author fatal flaws with this model?)

Yeah, I'm not the right person to ask: my current and previous institutions are Penn State and IoA, so I have thorough indoctrination in the canon rather than cannon.

Also my primary interests in GRBs are progenitors and hosts rather than physical processes - it is a delicate subfield and life is too short

I keep half an eye on the issue, out of interest, but am not an unbiased source