Stuart Staniford on Chinese Transportation Growth

Stuart Staniford is blogging. This is wonderful. As some of you may remember, Staniford disappeared from The Oil Drum a couple of years ago, after doing some astonishingly brilliant work on peak oil, biofuels and all sorts of stuff. Now Staniford and I disagree on a number of things, but he's a genius with data, and genius is important. Whenever Staniford annoys me, I think of what Emerson said of Carlyle: "If genius were cheap, we might do without Carlyle, but in the existing population he cannot be spared." I'm glad we've got Staniford back - we can't spare him.

His latest takes Chinese national statistics on transportation and demonstrates that if they are accurate, the size of the Chinese highway system will soon exceed the American one, that Chinese air travel is rising rapidly and that the transition to a car-centered and oil dependent economy is proceeding apace. This, of course, is problematic. Now it is easy to blame China for wanting what we have - and a dream we spent bazillions exporting to them, but that's not the point. The point is that the brakes are off, and we are heading towards a bang against hard limits on multiple fronts now.

Staniford's conclusion is this:


In summary, if present trends continue, the Chinese expressway system will likely grow larger than the US interstate highway system within the next couple of years, and Chinese car ownership will exceed US car ownership by somewhere in the neighborhood of 2017. So while the al-Shahristani plan for Iraqi oil production seems like it aims for an extraordinary increase in oil production in a hurry, it's not at all hard to see where all that oil can go. Oversimplifying greatly, it's as though the US borrowed a pile of money from China in order to fight a war to free up oil supply in Iraq in order that China could become the greatest industrial power the world has ever seen.

Oh, and you can see why China wasn't too keen to strike a deal in Copenhagen.

Read the whole article.

Sharon

More like this

I shouldn't complain - the Telegraph's energy columnist, Rowena Mason is technically affirming that even non-crazy people can believe in peak oil. Her essay, titled "You Don't Need to be a Mad Max Survivalist to Take Peak Oil Seriously" at least acknowledges the point. Her equation of Mad Max…
I didn't know Matt Simmons personally, and after some of his frankly ridiculous claims about what was happening in the Gulf, I am a little ambivalent about writing about his demise. One is supposed to speak well of the dead, and while I think some of his work on the Gulf (including his early…
I have an enormous amount of respect for Stuart Staniford, who I think is one of the best minds working on our collective ecological crisis. That said, we've had some serious debates, because I've tended to think that our situation, particularly our longer term food situation, is more serious than…
I can't really blame George Monbiot or anyone else for buying the narrative hype.  Right now the overwhelming narrative is that we have no energy constraints at all.  Folks wonder aloud whether the US should join OPEC.  Increasingly ridiculous projections are made about the potential of shale oil…

Sharon, should you have some spare time,lol, could I recommend a book, if you haven't already read it. Jeff Rubin's "Why Your world is about to get a whole lot smaller". Mr. Rubin was the Chief Economist at CIBC World Markets for almost 20yrs. This is a Canadian book, but it covers pretty much everyone,as he takes a more North American global approach. He was one of the first economists to predict soaring oil prices in 2000. It's not a hugely difficult read, but he covers the oil&gas quandry and fall out. It's nice to see an economist who isn't spouting the all is getting better so you can return to your previous lives banter, as he sees the next wave coming.
amanda

I have to wonder about this. There's a lot of fear in the West concerning China--its voracious appetite for oil and raw materials, its abusive economic and currency policies, its flagrant disregard for its own ecology and that of the world, its human rights abuses and so on. However for all its might, China seems intent on hobbling itself with a petroleum and car-centric infrastructure that will be of no more use to it than ours will be to us when the more dramatic effects of peak oil are manifest. China's massive economic explosion in recent years may be a short-lived phenomenon, because it's as subject to the second law of thermodynamics as the rest of us.