It can be difficult to convince present-focused researchers to give a long-term perspective, such as that of a librarian or archivist, the time of day. (So to speak.) Here's my favorite way to do it: the "… and then what?" game.
You have digital data. You think it's important. We'll start from there.
- Your grant runs out… and then what?
- The graduate student who's been doing all the data-management chores leaves with Ph.D in hand… and then what?
- Your favorite grant agency institutes a data-sustainability requirement for all grants… and then what?
- Your lab's PI retires… and then what?
- Your instrument manufacturer or favorite software's developer goes out of business… and then what?
- Your whomped-up next-door data center burns up, falls down, then sinks into the swamp… and then what?
You get the idea. No far-fetched catastrophizing, just all-too-plausible scenarios that researchers really ought to have thought about already but usually haven't. If your service can position itself as the "… and then what," you're on to something.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
As I watch the environment around me for signs of data curation inside institutions, particularly in libraries, I seem to see two general classes of approach to the problem. One starts institution-wide, generally with a grand planning process. Another starts at the level of the individual…
Kristin Briney's Data Management for Researchers: Organize, maintain and share your data for research success is a book that should be on the shelf (physical or virtual) of every librarian, researcher and research administrator. Scientists, engineers, social scientists, humanists -- anyone who's…
Some interesting ferment happening in repository-land, notably this discussion of various types and scales of repositories and how successful they can expect to be given the structural conditions in which they are embedded.
I don't blog repositories per se any more, so I'm not going to address the…
Many people, first confronted with the idea of data curation, think it's a storage problem. A commonly-expressed notion is "give them enough disk and they'll be fine." Terabyte drives are cheap. Put one on the desk of every researcher, network it, and the problem evaporates, right?
Right?
Let me…