Christopher Nelson writes:
Check out the GDP chart under "The New Triad" here:
It's supposed to compare GDP in China, India, and the US for three time periods but for my money, it's composed wrong. The bars should be for the years, not the countries. That way we could see total GDP in each year and how it was composed of the respective GDPs. It would even be fairly easy to scan across and see how the country's GDP grew or shrank. What's there is just confusing.
I agree. Better to put time on the x-axis if possible. Then you don't need a bar plot at all, you can use a line plot, which I generally prefer.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
-Richard Feynman
Not so long ago I wrote a snarky post about economics…
Mike Spagat writes:
I hope that this new paper [by Michael Spagat, Andrew Mack, Tara Cooper, and Joakim Kreutz] on serious errors in a paper on conflict mortality published in the British Medical Journal will interest you. For one thing I believe that it is highly teachable. Beyond I think that…
In which the skewing of a data plot in Ron Unz's epic investigation of college admissions makes me more skeptical of his overall claim, thanks to the misleading tricks employed.
------------
Steve Hsu has a new post on a favorite topic of his, bias against Asians in higher ed admissions. This is…
Yesterday's bad graphic post spurred me to finally get around to doing the "Why Does Excel Suck So Much?" post I've been meaning to do for a while. I gripe about Excel a lot, as we're more or less forced to use it for data analysis in the intro labs (students who have taken the intro engineering…
Is that a stacked bar chart? Or do all the bars start at zero and the smaller bars obscure the bottoms of the larger bars? I couldn't tell from the article.
Those must all start at zero, I would assume GDP would increase over time, not decrease and then rebound. What a confusingly constructed graph!
I think the best choice here would be three bars next to each other for each country, not grouped by year. That way, you can see the growth over time for each country, and compare across countries as well.
I also disagree about using lines here, since these are individual, distinct projections (not measured values). There is no data in between the years, so distinct bars are a better representation.
But yeah, terrible chart. The numbers are quite interesting though, and also the GDP/capita chart in the linked article.