Another Funny Brooch

i-5bed462d7e13fefc2d4c727233a6b239-P1000135lores.jpg

Here's a funny little guy from our site in Kaga. It's a crumpled-up disc-brooch, about 75% complete, original diameter 71 mm, copper-alloy pin extant and folded into the brooch, pin-catch extant on back, apparently soldered on.

i-7aeb5e1fae74b7429ad0c12a216b51c1-P1000134lores.jpg

On the surface of the brooch are a central large boss with mock-filigree, surrounded by five identical ones, and outside those five are another five smaller bosses. All in all eleven bosses. The surface of the brooch is divided into petal-like fields by lines of tiny bumps. All decoration is visible on the back side too: most of the piece is just 0.6 mm thick.

I really wonder about this baby. Judging from the rest of the finds on-site, it's likely to date from after AD 400. But it doesn't look much like anything Scandinavian from the period 400-1100. (During this period, Scandy brooch pins are almost exclusively iron.) It does look a bit like a cheap version of a Kentish 6th century cloisonné brooch. So my guess is that this piece is either

  • English/Frankish 400-1100,
  • Scandy 1100-1500, or
  • Continental 1100-1500.

Anybody able to help?

More like this

Today I didn't make any effort to entertain the kids until mid-afternoon. I was busy filling in some gaps and writing the last piece of text for my Ãstergötland manuscript, an entry for the gazetter at the end of the book. It's been my main project for almost four years. What remains now is…
I really enjoyed my work yesterday. The forenoon saw me in the stores of the Museum of National Antiquities looking through Otto Frödin's uncatalogued finds from the "SverkersgÃ¥rden" site near Alvastra monastery. Not only did I find all the elusive 1st Millennium stuff that's mentioned in the…
Polyhedrical weight. 9/10th century. Photograph Tobias Bondesson. (Martin here, posting from the hostel of Norsholm on the Göta canal, using my handheld and the cell phone network. To get the post on-line, my dear scibling Janet has kindly agreed to act as go-between.) Coin struck for Heinrich…
Frag of a brooch decorated with embossed silver foil. 5th century. Photograph Tobias Bondesson. Our site in Kimstad parish looked even better than I'd thought. This was one of many cases where I've come swooping in to sites that I've never visited before and directed metal detecting. In Kimstad, I…

Martin,
I've looked through our database and found very few examples that match your brooch. There's this cloissone one:
http://www.findsdatabase.org.uk/hms/pas_obj.php?type=finds&id=0013EA161…
which has a slight similarity. The ring and dot does indeed suggest that it fits the Early Medieval date, but it doesn't look like one of our typical cloissone examples. So I wonder if this is more likely to be a crushed saucer brooch? Have a look through these and see if you can see any matches:
http://www.findsdatabase.org.uk/search/index.php?loadsearch=1064#a1064
Regards,
Dan

Holy sh... I don't even remember when my hands looked that "un-excavating-stuff"-ish. They're permanently messed up now, and my nails...well, let's not even go there.
Oh, nice find, too!!

By Christina (not verified) on 17 Apr 2008 #permalink

See what I meant about context?
Okey, maybe it was a plowzone find, but getting it out of an ex u would be so much better.

I got to go. Glad you are up to so much and haven't yet sold your soul to get a real job. And about getting your licks in on Bad Bob. Take it easy.

By M E Starr (not verified) on 12 Jul 2008 #permalink