As detailed before (here and here) I did a trial dig with friends in an undated great barrow near Sjögestad church in Östergötland last September. We secured samples that allowed radiocarbon dating to the Early Viking Period (9th century) and the identification of several plant species in small hearths that had been lit on the barrow as it was being erected.
I filed the excavation report the other day, and it is now available on-line in Swedish for all to read. Check it out! If anything's hard to understand, don't be afraid to ask.
[More blog entries about archaeology, Sweden, vikings, vikingperiod, barrows, radiocarbon; arkeologi, Östergötland, vikingatiden, gravhög.]
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Readers of my blogging over the past 14 months will have come across many references to, and tidbits from, the work with the archive report for 2005's Viking Period boat grave excavation at Skamby in Östergötland. Howard Williams and myself directed the excavations of the first boat inhumation in…
Sun Spurge
My friend Dr Jens Heimdahl is a Renaissance man. He's a quaternary geologist, an urban archaeologist, a palaeobotanist, a talented painter and a writer of essays on weird literature. He's co-translated Lovecraft's novella The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath into Swedish and illustrated it…
As an undergrad and PhD student in the 90s I heard a lot of rumours about the 1988-93 excavation of Gullhögen, a barrow in Husby-Långhundra parish between Stockholm and Uppsala. These rumours held that the barrow was pretty weird: built out of charcoal (!), unusually rich, and sitting on top of…
The other day, I collected the larger finds from 2005's boat grave excavations at the conservator's studio. Among them are 23 amber gaming pieces, of which I have now taken nice photographs. The pieces' median dimensions are about 35 by 24 mm.
If it weren't for these gaming pieces, the boat grave…
What's the distinction between a great barrow and a not-so-great barrow?
I don't think the distinction really exists in British archaeological English. In Sweden, mounds are divided by diameter into three types just to make it easier to talk about them.
1. Mound, hög. Diameter up to 15 m. Very common.
2. Great barrow, storhög. Diameter 15-30 m.
3. Royal barrow, kungshög. Diameter over 30 m. Very rare.
Totally off the point, but interesting nevertheless: maybe you've seen this already, but new ancient tombs have been found in Egypt: http://tinyurl.com/37jcbk
And, talking of Egyptian tombs, do you happen to know if a second attempt was made with sending that little robot up the shaft in the Cheops pyramid? I can't find anything on the web about it, and I thought you might be the man to ask...
Ahem. It's always really embarrassing for me to get these questions. I mean, ask a physicist about gravity or atoms, and she'll know, right? And an archaeologist who knows nothing about Egypt and the pyramids is of course like a physicist who knows nothing about gravity or atoms.
But here's the ugly truth: most archaeologists know nothing whatsoever about Egypt. Because archaeology is not one discipline: it's one discipline for each county-sized piece of land on Earth. And you can do fairly well at archaeology in your home county without knowing much about what it's like two counties away.
Now, did you hear about the Medieval seal matrix they found near Linköping not long ago? (-;
No, but I'm sure it would make a great post if you could get some pictures.
Here's a seal matrix from Shropshire which surfaced in 2006.
"SERVITE DOMINO IN TIMORE" - sounds like a real nice guy.
I did snap a few pix of the seal matrix. I'll write something about it once I've had time to talk to the State Herald (!) who, I hear, has seen the thing and can tell me something about what kind of person has owned it.
The Shropshire find is beautiful! Even though I'm not working with the High Middle Ages, I'd be thrilled to find something like that the next time I go out metal detecting.