Reader "Chez Jake" suggests that I might write a few "basics of archaeology" posts like other Sb bloggers are doing. I'd be happy to! Dear Reader, please tell me something basic you'd like me to explain about archaeology that isn't answered well by Wikipedia.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
A post up at Bayblab is causing a bit of a stir; ScienceBlogs.com is singled out as an incestuous conclave of hacks* where bloggers are paid substantial sums to turn out tabloid-quality science writing. Alright, maybe such a summary isn't entirely accurate, but the post by "Anonymous Coward" paints…
We're starting a new program here at Sb where specially-selected readers have the ability to pick out the best of what's appearing in the whole of the community. It works like this; I get to pick two readers who then get the ability to tag three posts per week that will go into an RSS feed that…
This week's Ask a ScienceBlogger question deals with blogging itself, and not so much with science:
How is it that all the PIs (Tara, PZ, Orac et al.), various grad students, post-docs, etc. find time to fulfill their primary objectives (day jobs) and blog so prolifically?
I have a slightly more…
Through the magic of the intertubes, Blake has a dump-truck full of reflection on the current state of science blogging and what science blogs can't do. The question at the center of the post is "Can someone get a fair science education from reading science blogs?" and Blake says no, citing the…
You could explain how the life of a typical archaelogist is just like Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.
Yes, and of course emphasise that people in India are cruel, stupid and superstitious and that they eat bugs.
That reminds me of trying to find the way to a temple in Cefalu. I asked for directions, got a funny look and the local pointed the way up to the rock where the temple is. I'd forgotten I'd watched Indiana Jones in Italian the night before. Il Tempio Maledetto is not a good translation for Temple of Diana.
Sounds like something one of Eco's diabolics would say...
Some thoughts and suggestions on blog posts (whether or not they fit your theme of "basic things about archeology"):
- Enabling new tools in archaeology - not just for documenting digs, but also in interpreting data.
- Along the same lines: the methods for how data of a completely different nature can be integrated or synthesized to create an understanding, say physical artefacts, botanical/zoological remains and genetic and linguistic data
- A series of "State of the find" posts presenting the latest data and interpretations (as well as remaining controversies) for some well-known finds (Lascaux, Clovis, Macchu Pichu, L'Anse aux Meadows ... I'm sure you can come up with many more)
Just a little wish list from half a mile from Iarlabanki's bridge...
Those are good ideas! I'll give them some thought.
The only thing that comes to mind is dating techniques, but that can be quite dry.
I've always been interested in how archaeology leads to better understanding of past medical practices, health beliefs, etc.
Glad to hear that things are going well at the new blog home!
A little something for the nighthawks:
(Umberto Rundkvist: Il Tempio Maledetto - Or: The Gentle Art of Persuading Diabolical Archaeologists of All Kinds Into Doing Bizarre Tricks in a Language Nobody Understands. Stockholm 1963. I quote the facsimile reprint; Basel 2003, p. 742f.)
I have to much spare time.
And to little understanding of HTML entities, I might add.
LOL! Love you, man!